balanced map rotation
19 posts
• Page 1 of 1
balanced map rotation
The current map rotation is ok but I wonder if it is possible to alternate attack and defense map.
For example, axis defend on the first then attack on the second then defend on the third etc.
Otherwise I still spam my /!\ Even TEAMS !!! /!\
cya
For example, axis defend on the first then attack on the second then defend on the third etc.
Otherwise I still spam my /!\ Even TEAMS !!! /!\
cya
Not bad idea, but maybe a bit difficult for the owner i think. Imagine you have to change 1 map (for example goldrush), you have to search 1 map when the allies have to attack yes or yes? and ps1 have a bit problems with some maps actually (like capuzzo, saberpeak) when always you found (like me for example ) players with problems with the ping (lags).
But if the owner can do it possible, is a great idea. 1 map for attack 1 map for defend, it is fair (and less !shuffle ).
But if the owner can do it possible, is a great idea. 1 map for attack 1 map for defend, it is fair (and less !shuffle ).
Xand3r wrote:i agree with that idea
but about your behaviour at server that spamming Even teams stop it pls
if u say it 1 -3 times its ok but if u say it about 5 > times its too much :s
GREETZ,
Xand3r
Well, it wouldn't be a problem if the teams would be evened everytime it's needed..
About that thread, yes, it's a good idea, I guess that's possible to set up.
It is not about playing maps 2 times vulture.
In some maps allies have to attack and in others axis. The idea is to make the rotation that for example first map allies attack and second axis.
would be like
1. Goldrush (allies attack)
2. Parisbastille (axis attack)
3. Venice (allies attack)
4. Other map for axis attack
The main problem is that there much more allies attack map than axis attack, the idea isnt completely possible.
In some maps allies have to attack and in others axis. The idea is to make the rotation that for example first map allies attack and second axis.
would be like
1. Goldrush (allies attack)
2. Parisbastille (axis attack)
3. Venice (allies attack)
4. Other map for axis attack
The main problem is that there much more allies attack map than axis attack, the idea isnt completely possible.
quoting deep:
henksmadje please read topic more carefully and other topics too where u reply, then u get the point and dont have to make stupid posts.
henksmadje please read topic more carefully and other topics too where u reply, then u get the point and dont have to make stupid posts.
Smadje wrote:It is not about playing maps 2 times vulture.
In some maps allies have to attack and in others axis. The idea is to make the rotation that for example first map allies attack and second axis.
would be like
1. Goldrush (allies attack)
2. Parisbastille (axis attack)
3. Venice (allies attack)
4. Other map for axis attack
The main problem is that there much more allies attack map than axis attack, the idea isnt completely possible.
This is just a copy/paste from another forum, so the maps might not fit to PS1..
[et_code]Allied maps:
1. - african fuel dump (beta 5) - file name - AFD_Beta5,
2. - bergen (final) - file name bergen,
3. - dubrovnik final - file name - dubrovnik_final,
4. - El Kef stopwatch (final) - file name - sw_el_kef,
5. - grave robbery (beta 1) - file name - graverob_b1 (atm in campaigns),
6. - transmitter - file name - transmitter (with secret pass, fixed by peyote I think),
7. - navarone (final) - file name - navarone (personal I have sentiment to this map. I was invited there by Belze to |>B<|),
8. - saberpeak (final) - file name - saberpeak_final,
9. - x-posed (final) - file name - xposed,
10. - secret bay (final 1.0) - file name - secret_bay_et,
11. - intelligence center (beta 2) - file name - intel_center_b2,
12. - super goldrush (final) - file name - supergoldrush_final.
Dual maps:
1. - alleys (final) - file name - alleys,
2. - canyon 3 - file name - canyon3 (new map need to test it on b3 pls),
3. - byzntine - file name - byzantine (atm in campaigns),
4. - baserace beta 2 - file name - baserace_b2 (atm in campaigns, is beta 4 availablle?)
5. - sands of time (beta 2) - file name - sot_b2 (atm in campaigns),
6. - ctf pool (v2) - file name - ctf_pool_v2 (atm in campaigns),
7. - stonehenge King of the Hill (Beta 1) - file name - stonehenge_KOTH (knives, nades etc...),
8. - darji2 - file name - darji2.
Axis maps:
1. - berserk tournament edition - file name - berserk_te (is it possible to switch off dj here?) ,
2. - industry stop watch edition - file name - industry_swe (atm in campaigns),
3. - et ice - file name - et_ice,
4. - caen - file name - caen (atm in campaigns),
5. - pantherbase (beta 1.0) - file name - pantherbase_et ( ammo lift bug is fixed?),
6. - mlb egypt (final) - file name - mlb_egypt (peyote do u still have this fixed version?),
7. - mlb hotchkiss - file name - mlb_hotchkiss,
8. - mlb bayraid (final) - file name - mlb_bayraid (I want this map but I think it is still very laggy),
9. - venegance tournament edition (final) - file name - venegance_te_final.[/et_code]
I will try to keep it on mind when i change maps but as said above, basically on ET allies are more attackers than defenders even if sometimes o, maps like goldrush i have some doubts . The other problem is that looking to the size of PS1 , not every map can match with the rotation, which is also a real headache when i have to search for new maps, plus i don realy knows all ET maps etc ... Anyway , i m ok to give a try but i have limited possibilities and yes it s a nice idea except for the one who have to do it .
why do you even bother with this topic (although i know it's a good idea) since it seems to be all the time ego-random-rambo medics who will pass u by without checking their compass to see who is wounded...this is pointless since most regulars just go their way shooting and not even saying sry after a tk...But the idea is good though butnot on PS1, people aren't ready for teamplay (yet)..
Have fun fraggging wheeee
signed: sarcastic bastard
Have fun fraggging wheeee
signed: sarcastic bastard
Spaceman wrote:why do you even bother with this topic (although i know it's a good idea) since it seems to be all the time ego-random-rambo medics who will pass u by without checking their compass to see who is wounded...this is pointless since most regulars just go their way shooting and not even saying sry after a tk...But the idea is good though butnot on PS1, people aren't ready for teamplay (yet)..
Have fun fraggging wheeee
signed: sarcastic bastard
What the hell are you talking about?
This is about a campaign which switch from allies attack to axis attack every time ^^
GokuSan wrote:Spaceman wrote:why do you even bother with this topic (although i know it's a good idea) since it seems to be all the time ego-random-rambo medics who will pass u by without checking their compass to see who is wounded...this is pointless since most regulars just go their way shooting and not even saying sry after a tk...But the idea is good though butnot on PS1, people aren't ready for teamplay (yet)..
Have fun fraggging wheeee
signed: sarcastic bastard
What the hell are you talking about?
This is about a campaign which switch from allies attack to axis attack every time ^^
lol gokouille u fat bastard(lol, nice avatar ) i'm talking about teamplay how the hell can a team (axis or allies) win if no 1 is doing obj???
see what i mean?
Spaceman wrote:GokuSan wrote:Spaceman wrote:why do you even bother with this topic (although i know it's a good idea) since it seems to be all the time ego-random-rambo medics who will pass u by without checking their compass to see who is wounded...this is pointless since most regulars just go their way shooting and not even saying sry after a tk...But the idea is good though butnot on PS1, people aren't ready for teamplay (yet)..
Have fun fraggging wheeee
signed: sarcastic bastard
What the hell are you talking about?
This is about a campaign which switch from allies attack to axis attack every time ^^
lol gokouille u fat bastard(lol, nice avatar ) i'm talking about teamplay how the hell can a team (axis or allies) win if no 1 is doing obj???
see what i mean?
If HUN t is in the attacking team, there is no problem..
Well, the question is not really on the teamplay, it's more likely that at least both teams can camp at least once / 30 minutes.. See what I mean? ^^'
19 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Return to PS Forum Archives - 2010
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 22 guests