Speed of Panzer
51 posts
• Page 1 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Speed of Panzer
Now!
Since you closed PS#F&O and all, I was wondering if you could...
You know, add more speed to the rockets?
It's too slow IMO, even a turtle could dodge it.
Just a suggestion, don't frame me and everything.
But, I added a poll anyhow.
IF! This has already been discussed, and turned down...
Don't kill me, because I haven't been able to find a topic about it!
Since you closed PS#F&O and all, I was wondering if you could...
You know, add more speed to the rockets?
It's too slow IMO, even a turtle could dodge it.
Just a suggestion, don't frame me and everything.
But, I added a poll anyhow.
IF! This has already been discussed, and turned down...
Don't kill me, because I haven't been able to find a topic about it!
No, absolutely not! It's fine as it is.
Make the panzer faster will just raise up the chaos on PS1. Fast Panzer is fine in some 6on6 but not on 12on12, this will just end in a big massive spam and in my eyes we have allready enough of this by airstrikes, nades and mortar So keep it as it allready is!
Make the panzer faster will just raise up the chaos on PS1. Fast Panzer is fine in some 6on6 but not on 12on12, this will just end in a big massive spam and in my eyes we have allready enough of this by airstrikes, nades and mortar So keep it as it allready is!
- Leo_The_God
- Posts: 689
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 0:00
- Location: Italy
If u want fast panzer make slow charge for it... otherwise how carebear said will make a lot of chaos on server
GoD is DeaD
- FlowerPower
- Posts: 2605
- Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 0:00
- Location: Italy
Daghel wrote:Increasing the panzer speed and decreasing demage of nades could be a nice compromise, the level of chaos will stay the same
Absolutely not! Learn to use panzer, nabby!
egglaf wrote:Btw, the poll is a bit suggestive...
What's that supposed to mean?
ANYHOW!
It's true, (as someone pointed out) the riflenades are stronger, that's weird.
It should be the heavy rockets with more firepower that should deal more damage!
Besides... We could increase the speed of the rockets,
and lower the damage of riflenades and rockets. (Mostly riflenades ofc. )
EDIT: Oh and as Leo said, we could also lower the charge of panza...
- Dre_of_chaos
- Posts: 281
- Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 0:00
Just because you can't play on PS3/5 anymore doesn't mean you have to transform PS1 into PS3/5...
https://account.hirezstudios.com/tribes ... al=1248832 tribes ascend!!
No, better balance of the classes.
Soldier with panza vs Engie with rifle nade
Speed:
soldier -> decreased
engie -> normal
bullets :
soldier -> 6
engie -> 8 (9?)
Ballistic:
soldier ->only stright
engie ->stright, above the objets, behind the corners
Amount per team:
soldier -> 1
engie ->3
demage ->same
Plus engie can shoot with riffle instantly after launching the nade, soldier has to change the weapon after shooting with panza and that costs time.
Soldier with panza vs Engie with rifle nade
Speed:
soldier -> decreased
engie -> normal
bullets :
soldier -> 6
engie -> 8 (9?)
Ballistic:
soldier ->only stright
engie ->stright, above the objets, behind the corners
Amount per team:
soldier -> 1
engie ->3
demage ->same
Plus engie can shoot with riffle instantly after launching the nade, soldier has to change the weapon after shooting with panza and that costs time.
Chaos is the only true answer.
- FlowerPower
- Posts: 2605
- Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 0:00
- Location: Italy
Lol Daghel, nice story but I don't buy it
Engy has to do the object so he "deserve" his rifle power. Soldier has just to kill enemies, sometimes it's helpful, sometimes just pure frags. So no need to come out with this "balance the class" please.
Just say like it is: "I want a faster rocket cause I can't kill anyone here", and it would be more senseful
Engy has to do the object so he "deserve" his rifle power. Soldier has just to kill enemies, sometimes it's helpful, sometimes just pure frags. So no need to come out with this "balance the class" please.
Just say like it is: "I want a faster rocket cause I can't kill anyone here", and it would be more senseful
51 posts
• Page 1 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Return to PS Forum Archives - 2012
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests