Et quake wars
41 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
by Damelon » Fri Dec 29, 2006 15:48
Repta wrote:icefrost wrote:indeed, nice graphic this game have, but i miss the old school weapon style. don't like weapons like this, there is only shoot -> kill, no aiming, no fun for me. then i like more to play on a not so good graphic but with more fun. Anyway, this game will never run on my machine ^^
Have you played ET:QW??? no? Have you played quake4?? no?
If you have you will know it isn t shoot>kill you have 2 different sides the GDF are the humans they use bullets but of course no Mp40s, they need to reload. Then you have the strogg they are the aliens they have the plasma weapons they don t have to reload but they can be overloaded (look at the sten/mg42). I think you won t be able to kill some1 much quicker in ET:QW then ET
omg...im started to like this game...but my love is the normal wolf ET
but offcourse i try this game and maybe if we all love it we can try a server on it
by Repta » Fri Dec 29, 2006 16:10
mobius-one wrote:It's nor very bad, and i am sure i can play this game becuase of my PC. but i also see a old game in it back named Command & conquer. annyone know this game?
Hm CnC3 tiberium wars?? 1 problem it is made by EA :S and EA sucks. You also need a good PC for it. If you want to read more you should check this site/community http://www.gamereplays.org/cnc3/ it is a huge RTS community.
by Mobius » Fri Dec 29, 2006 16:13
Dude are u crazy in your mind 
EA games don't suck 
atleast it's my opinoin 
and i can play it on my computer. most of it games u just need a intel pentium 4.1 procesort and al is fine. but now the games of C&Care beter (the graphics) and now u need a really good computer^^
EA games don't suck atleast it's my opinoin and i can play it on my computer. most of it games u just need a intel pentium 4.1 procesort and al is fine. but now the games of C&Care beter (the graphics) and now u need a really good computer^^
by icefrost » Fri Dec 29, 2006 19:12
repta wrote:Have you played ET:QW??? no? Have you played quake4?? no?
If you have you will know it isn t shoot>kill you have 2 different sides the GDF are the humans they use bullets but of course no Mp40s, they need to reload. Then you have the strogg they are the aliens they have the plasma weapons they don t have to reload but they can be overloaded (look at the sten/mg42). I think you won t be able to kill some1 much quicker in ET:QW then ET
no and no ^^
i just commend the video how i saw it, and there was no aiming or something like that, so no fun for me.
i also don't like these future weapons, maybe now realtime weapons, who knows, but don't like it, it's too overacted, better a simple reloading mp 40 in my hand ^^
it's just my favorete game so i don't care about graphic, it's not that important for me and yea i never was having a multiplayer-game with fun like ET. that's why i still stay on it and don't want to try games out like this one.
"Some people believe football is a matter of life and death.
I am very disappointed with that attitude.
I can assure you it is much, much more important than that."
I am very disappointed with that attitude.
I can assure you it is much, much more important than that."
by Repta » Fri Dec 29, 2006 19:28
mobius-one wrote:Dude are u crazy in your mind
I am talking about the support that EA gives i dunno if ET is the only online game you play but onlone EA games suck. This is because they don t give support.
For example Lord of the rings battle for middle-earth2 Rise of the Witchking, it is an expansion of lotr bfme2. It costs 30€ you have a few extra units new faction etc. The game is no fun ONLINE because there is no balance. You can win with 1 kind of unit and 2 factions are to strong. Ok the game is just out so we will soon get a patch. What says EA no we can t make a patch because, we don t got enough man power because they are working on CnC3
. They make a game take the money and leave it and go for the next game. They are also good at false promises, BFME2 collectors edition: control he dragon! Only owners of the collector's edition can control this huge, devasting NEW unit. It is the same dragon only now it use 6 random skins..... a few new maps... great you can download them after 1 week with the normal edition.
Battlefield2124 you can buy it for 50€ so you think it is a new game..... what do you get a MOD a *beep* MOD that isn t 50€ worth. Great now they have put also some kind of spyware in the game hmmmmm great.
EA is focusing on the singleplayer they should focus on the multiplayer. You play the singleplayer 6 hours then you start the multiplayer if it is bad you play the game +- 10 hours total. If you focus on multiplayer you play the singleplayer and then have fun with the multiplayer for years. ET > more then 3 years.
EA is focusing on the singleplayer so why should i buy a game that i play for 10 hours.... so thats why we have azureus
(torrent)no and no ^^
i just commend the video how i saw it, and there was no aiming or something like that, so no fun for me.
i also don't like these future weapons, maybe now realtime weapons, who knows, but don't like it, it's too overacted, better a simple reloading mp 40 in my hand ^^
it's just my favorete game so i don't care about graphic, it's not that important for me and yea i never was having a multiplayer-game with fun like ET. that's why i still stay on it and don't want to try games out like this one.
lol it was just a video.... and it wasn t 1st person. I have been playing for +- 3 years now i have had a few breaks in those breaks i have played other games, but after that i started ET again because it is so great. ET:QW is of the same makers as ET so that is why i wanna try it because ET is so great. The graphics are nice but i don t realy care about it.
by Frodo » Fri Dec 29, 2006 21:25
Too much ppl - players of et on PS servers - don't have enough good computer for that game. Especially for something about 32players, in WET i have sometimes 60 fps when server is full (40). Second, the ppl who have enough good PC for that game, they can don't like the ET:QW. Not that style. And, some ppl who like the game, and have enough good PC, don't want leave ingame friends from standard ET game, who don't have enough good PC for ETQW, or don't like it. So i think this game will be crap, and too much ppl go to ETQW, for graphics and other. No comments for ppl who wants ETQW...
by Mobius » Sat Dec 30, 2006 16:15
Repta, that's your opionon about it. i don't have anny problems with EA Games.
Like i care^^ i hate Lord of the rings.
and C&C Tiberium Wars IS Multi payer...u can play is online against other players AKA it's a MMO game.
Edit: sorry for the wrong post above this one
For example Lord of the rings battle for middle-earth2 Rise of the Witchking, it is an expansion of lotr bfme2. It costs 30€ you have a few extra units new faction etc. The game is no fun ONLINE because there is no balance. You can win with 1 kind of unit and 2 factions are to strong. Ok the game is just out so we will soon get a patch. What says EA no we can t make a patch because, we don t got enough man power because they are working on CnC3 . They make a game take the money and leave it and go for the next game.
Like i care^^ i hate Lord of the rings.
and C&C Tiberium Wars IS Multi payer...u can play is online against other players AKA it's a MMO game.
Edit: sorry for the wrong post above this one
by Repta » Sat Dec 30, 2006 17:55
mobius-one wrote:Repta, that's your opionon about it. i don't have anny problems with EA Games.
For example Lord of the rings battle for middle-earth2 Rise of the Witchking, it is an expansion of lotr bfme2. It costs 30€ you have a few extra units new faction etc. The game is no fun ONLINE because there is no balance. You can win with 1 kind of unit and 2 factions are to strong. Ok the game is just out so we will soon get a patch. What says EA no we can t make a patch because, we don t got enough man power because they are working on CnC3 . They make a game take the money and leave it and go for the next game.
Like i care^^ i hate Lord of the rings.
and C&C Tiberium Wars IS Multi payer...u can play is online against other players AKA it's a MMO game.
Edit: sorry for the wrong post above this one
like i care that you hate lotr..... it was an example. CnC3 tiberium wars is single and multiplayer i know that so is lotr:bfme2 but i am saying that they give bad support to the online gamers. EA makes a game sells it and then leaves to make a new game. They should make a game and leave it when it is finished so balanced and most bugs fixed. They should fix there problems before they make new ones.
Repta, that's your opionon about it. i don't have anny problems with EA Games.
balance is not an opinion it is a fact. The fact about lotr:bfme2 rotwk is that it is unbalanced. People have different opinions but if you think it is normal what EA does then i think that you have a strange opinion.
by Mobius » Sun Dec 31, 2006 22:14
No i haven't. it's normal what EA does becuase they support a game after making it. if it wasn't so then u could't E-mail them or calling them for bugs Etc. Dude just leave it alone^^ i like it verry much and that's it u can't change it. 
That's my opinion and that's your opinion. Case clost.
it's normal what EA does becuase they support a game after making it. if it wasn't so then u could't E-mail them or calling them for bugs Etc. Dude just leave it alone^^ i like it verry much and that's it u can't change it. That's my opinion and that's your opinion. Case clost.
41 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Return to PS Forum Archives - 2006
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests