A Question :)

by **fluffY** » Wed Oct 31, 2007 15:57

Intel Core 2 Duo E6750, 4mb @ 3600mhz, Gigabyte P35 S3 (Bearlake), Memorys: A-data 2GB DDRII 800+ @ 1100mhz Over Clock Extreme Edition, VideoCard: nVidia 8800GTS 320mb, HDD: 320gb, 16mb, SATA II, refrigeration: AeroCool HT-102, body: Aerocool ExtremeEngine 3T ( with all addons ),Ventilations:1x 250mm, 1x 140mm (blue LED),1x 120mm, PSU: Fortron Bluestorm II 500W, DVD-/ +RW SATA Lightscribe, Add refrigeration

I showed it because, i wanna know is this computer good for buying ? and is it good for games

?

Pls answer.

Bec theres not long for my birthday , (11th Nov.)
I want to know is it good for buying, then i can say to my parents they buy me that

.

So i can play better games ? or cant ? ;

Thanks.

Greets
.ShorT

pls help

by **Deathstalker** » Wed Oct 31, 2007 16:22

yep it is so goooood
if u can change GF8800GTS 640 on GF8800GTX 768

other parts are good (in my houmble opinion

)

by **Damelon** » Wed Oct 31, 2007 16:34

Nypel wrote:yep it is so goooood
if u can change GF8800GTS 640 on GF8800GTX 768
other parts are good (in my houmble opinion )

+1

you can run medal of phonor airbone without lags for exemple

by **landser** » Wed Oct 31, 2007 16:47

Short wrote:So i can play better games ?

wolfenstein ET is the best game ... so why buying a new computer?

by **fluffY** » Wed Oct 31, 2007 17:12

landser wrote:
Short wrote:So i can play better games ?

wolfenstein ET is the best game ... so why buying a new computer?

Yeah, et is best

, And i mean with better games, like heavyer, like Crysis, i want to try that.

nothing beats ET , and nothing beats PS

.

THanks all, think i get it

Greets
.ShorT

by **Union** » Wed Oct 31, 2007 21:54

The only "bottleneck" is the graphics card in my opinion (8600GTS can run ArmA at the same rate as a 7900GT 256mb - 30fps

) - but pls, stay away from any gigabyte silentpipe edition (it overheated in 2 hours in my case :\ )
So i'd recomend buying a GTX or looking into some radeons (2900 series maybe?)
The other thing, CPU has a FSB of 1333MHz (if i'm not mistaken) so overclocked RAM isn't gonna make any visible difference (800 * 2 => 1600MHz FSB)
+ i don't know if the motherboard can support such memory (Supports DDR2 1066* memory for outstanding system performance. - not sure if it's the right one)
But overall, it's a really nice computer, QW should run smoothly on it (if my E6400 and 7950GT can run it at 70-125FPS, this beasty should have 125 constant @ 1680x1050)

by **fluffY** » Wed Oct 31, 2007 22:09

uni0n wrote:The only "bottleneck" is the graphics card in my opinion (8600GTS can run ArmA at the same rate as a 7900GT 256mb - 30fps ) - but pls, stay away from any gigabyte silentpipe edition (it overheated in 2 hours in my case :\ )
So i'd recomend buying a GTX or looking into some radeons (2900 series maybe?)
The other thing, CPU has a FSB of 1333MHz (if i'm not mistaken) so overclocked RAM isn't gonna make any visible difference (800 * 2 => 1600MHz FSB)
+ i don't know if the motherboard can support such memory (Supports DDR2 1066* memory for outstanding system performance. - not sure if it's the right one)
But overall, it's a really nice computer, QW should run smoothly on it (if my E6400 and 7950GT can run it at 70-125FPS, this beasty should have 125 constant @ 1680x1050)

Ty For help m8

.

btw what videocard do u have ?

Greets
.ShorT

by **---Henry---** » Wed Oct 31, 2007 22:57

landser wrote:
Short wrote:So i can play better games ?

wolfenstein ET is the best game ... so why buying a new computer?

+1 same

I have suck comp...2600+ processor and 512 MB/RAM
And i will not buy new comp yet cause ET just own!

Henry

by **Union** » Wed Oct 31, 2007 23:09

@Short : I have the asus 7950GT 512Mb at the moment

Edit: forgot to mention, my 7950 gets 125FPS in ET (8600GTS got the avg. 75/43 in some maps, 7900GT 333constant/1800max) so don't be surprised if your new computer runs ET slower then your previous box

(probably an issue with unsuported cards - DX10 cards with their new arhitecture are probably more of an issue then other DX9 cards)

by **fluffY** » Wed Oct 31, 2007 23:27

uni0n wrote:@Short : I have the asus 7950GT 512Mb at the moment

Edit: forgot to mention, my 7950 gets 125FPS in ET (8600GTS got the avg. 75/43 in some maps, 7900GT 333constant/1800max) so don't be surprised if your new computer runs ET slower then your previous box

(probably an issue with unsuported cards - DX10 cards with their new arhitecture are probably more of an issue then other DX9 cards)

my box what i got atm, it got radeon 9000 or something

Dont think it runs faster than the new one :O. Or does it.

+Radeon 9000 dont support most of other games.

U mean DirectX10 is like more badder than DX9 ?
.

Greets
.ShorT

by **Union** » Thu Nov 01, 2007 0:09

Nah directx 10 is awsome, but the problem is that the programmers have to add support for the dx10 cards to the game (if they don't the game normaly runs slower - for example, ArmA didn't support DX10 cards so they got lousy performance, when the patch fixed that, the 8800GTX was finnaly able to run it at very high settings smoothly) becouse of the different arhitecture of the card

Hum i don't know how ET runs on a radeon 9000, but i was disappointed when i got the 8600GTS and remembered that my 4200Ti (64mb) ran the thing with +90 fps constant (on a 1600+ AMD :\ )

by **fluffY** » Thu Nov 01, 2007 0:12

uni0n wrote:Nah directx 10 is awsome, but the problem is that the programmers have to add support for the dx10 cards to the game (if they don't the game normaly runs slower - for example, ArmA didn't support DX10 cards so they got lousy performance, when the patch fixed that, the 8800GTX was finnaly able to run it at very high settings smoothly) becouse of the different arhitecture of the card

Hum i don't know how ET runs on a radeon 9000, but i was disappointed when i got the 8600GTS and remembered that my 4200Ti (64mb) ran the thing with +90 fps constant (on a 1600+ AMD :\ )

Ow, now i get it

But i dont know how its possible that 4200 Ti runs fps better than 8600GTS

Greets
.ShorT

by **Union** » Thu Nov 01, 2007 0:18

Have no idea how that could happen but it did (the other shock was when i tried a borrowed radeon X1300...76fps @ 1680x1050 constant...:S)

by **fluffY** » Thu Nov 01, 2007 0:43

All what i can say. Wow, amazing, lol!

OFFTOPIC

Sorry for that spamtopic. Real apologizes.

by **hero2zer0** » Fri Nov 02, 2007 12:58

Considering cost vs effectiveness, I'de go for an Nvidia 8800GT card which performs better than the GTS (both version) and almost on par with the GTX but has a market value amounting to half of a GTX

Dont believe me? Read this article at AnandTech

A Question :)

A Question :)

Re: A Question :)

Re: A Question :)

Re: A Question :)

Who is online