Slots.

by **Ajit** » Sun Oct 26, 2008 20:11

i just noticed that ps1 got now 50 slots. Isn't that going tooo biiiiiggg ??? And it was already laaggggyyy with 44 slots.

I just wonder was it good idea to increase slots number? ( i have suxy comp and i have feeling i can't play anymore in ps1)

by **Viduus** » Sun Oct 26, 2008 20:16

Agree with the orange cat on this one. It increased lags a lot and it becomes a nice slideshow when server is full or on maps (MLB) that were already laggy.

by **_InFeRnO_** » Sun Oct 26, 2008 20:22

Yes

unfortunately i get a lot of laggy too..
i lag too when are there 40 players and now is imopssible play...

but now there isn't the problem "server full" but...i prefer play less but play good then play ever and play bad...

by **Ninjadeer** » Sun Oct 26, 2008 20:44

small orange guy is right...

yeah, its nice that its easyer to get in, but if server is going to be full, its damn hard to get good maps, most of maps are too small for 50 players... MLB-maps are big, but like viduus said, they are damn laggy. imo 40 players are enough, sometimes even bit too much

by **Plastic_Jesus** » Sun Oct 26, 2008 20:44

Ahh Its not so lagy. Maybe I can get used to it

by **darky** » Sun Oct 26, 2008 20:56

i wanted to make a topic off this problem but our cat allready did.

i thinks its bad that the server has now 50 slots.

its a mess in server now. more slots and no punkbuster (i dont want punkbuster) is atracting cheaters. and the more slots atracs noobs and rulebreakers. i dont know why it is but it is.

i think the server was better before. like the guys above said. the maps are to small and with 44 many people had lag.

i think its not a good idea.

by **thomthom** » Sun Oct 26, 2008 21:04

give it some time and dont judge so early. :wink:

by **Ajit** » Sun Oct 26, 2008 21:45

Viduus wrote:Agree with the orange cat on this one.

haha lol

and i also wanna add this we all dont have so super duper mega computers like you have bowy (i mean with it 9999999 fps)

And if you are so rich ..... you can buy me new comp :>

by **EminYY** » Sun Oct 26, 2008 22:08

im agree with u to garf 44 slots was lagg/tb/tk verryyyy much
and now 50 slots

dam that isnt good

by **Wastl** » Sun Oct 26, 2008 22:45

50? What the hell man?

44 is already too much. What about 36?

by **wardew** » Sun Oct 26, 2008 22:54

seems me that the quake3 engine is laggy only over 32 players...
but the PS servers are very good and i can see a bit of lag only over 40 players... 40 players with some specs slots is the best...

by **FlowerPower** » Mon Oct 27, 2008 1:52

I've played only 2 maps, but it was laggy more than usual. I had to stop playing because my eyes hurted.

by **EminYY** » Mon Oct 27, 2008 9:58

wastl 36 is not good to i think 44 was perfect but sebbel and bowdown are the owners they gonna say what happen but i hope they gonna make 40 slots 4pv slots again

by **Ajit** » Mon Oct 27, 2008 11:47

well i can see that bowy has change it now to 42+4

by **Miszczu** » Mon Oct 27, 2008 12:14

And probablly that will stay (correct me if i am wrong Bow). That was only experiment as i could ee, and im glad ps1 come back to lower number of slots. 50 slots re not only causing the technical problems but it also makes that administrating server is kickin ur balls. Especially when u re only admin there.

by **Wastl** » Mon Oct 27, 2008 13:46

Dont like it anyway, 36 would still be too much, but since youd like a number around 40 I said 36 to not shock you too hard. ^^

22 ^^

by **MIKE** » Mon Oct 27, 2008 15:03

Wastl wrote:Dont like it anyway, 36 would still be too much, but since youd like a number around 40 I said 36 to not shock you too hard. ^^

+1

by **Ajit** » Mon Oct 27, 2008 15:24

MIKE wrote:
Wastl wrote:Dont like it anyway, 36 would still be too much, but since youd like a number around 40 I said 36 to not shock you too hard. ^^

+1

yeah agree

by **-KrIpTo-** » Mon Oct 27, 2008 16:14

Wastl wrote:Dont like it anyway, 36 would still be too much, but since youd like a number around 40 I said 36 to not shock you too hard. ^^

22 ^^

U didn't shock me

Anyway, 40 slots and 4pvs will be perfect, like the old one,, nothing more to add

by **Evil** » Mon Oct 27, 2008 17:39

50 is nice for me however people complaining about lag.
in the past when i was playing alot on bunker servers (and was member) my main server was also bunker #1 withs have 64 slots and completly no lag at all.
seems some problem with some maps for example or internet provider but atleast i dont have any lag on ps1 with 50 slots.

vote for stay.

by **Ajit** » Mon Oct 27, 2008 19:11

mhh evil we all don't have so good computers and we all aren't so rich to buy good computers. My comp is piece of shit

by **BOWDOWN** » Mon Oct 27, 2008 19:28

No need to panic. I was also wondering yesterday :wink:

. I was n t aware about the increase of slots, i connected and indeed saw the server with a kind of 24 vs 24 fight around

; after checking the server.cfg i found a message from Landser tellin me that he changed the number of slots to 50, i wanted testin the server limits so i keep it runin for some hours, but after some crashs landser reduc it to 48 and later i also reduce it to 46 (42+4 private slots). So, only 2 more slots around, imo not realy a big deal. We also ran PB for some hours in PS1, the two thinks together could explain the lags problem imo.

So, now the PB if off but i will run it time 2 time in the server :wink:

. About the slots, for the moment i did n t noticed any serious problem but can reduce it again if there is a need.

by **warren-the-ape** » Mon Oct 27, 2008 19:50

A bit strange that he's messing around with configs on the busiest server at the middle of the day.. :roll:

by **RaiderPL** » Thu Oct 30, 2008 4:33

Listen I agree with that cat. Last weekend I played on PS5 I can't play on PS1 if is that many players. My ping was 150 all a time. Lol when map its so big and that many people I can't play.

Bowdown u have to reduce some slots!!! this is not joke!!!

by **BOWDOWN** » Thu Oct 30, 2008 5:59

RaiderPL wrote:Listen I agree with that cat. Last weekend I played on PS5 I can't play on PS1 if is that many players. My ping was 150 all a time. Lol when map its so big and that many people I can't play.

Bowdown u have to reduce some slots!!! this is not joke!!!

I ve just backed to the number of slots we had some months ago (42+4 private =46), i can still reduce it and back to 40+4 but no more. It s already hard to connect when the server is full and we have all the time to kick players, if i reduce it to less slots, you players will be the first to suffer. Btw, not sure removin even 2,4 or 6 slots resolve your bad ping problems, we all know that it s more from you connection and config than 2 more or less slots in the server :wink:

.
Now about "big maps", due to the number of players we have i can t run only small maps, it will just be unplayable too and cause a big mess, btw i tried to do a mix of big maps like helmsdeep,UJE or MLB maps and some other smaller ones like Fata or ET Tower.
And yeah , i didn t noticed someone jokin here :wink:

.

Slots.

Slots.

Laag

Re: Laag

Who is online